malaysia immigration

Collective Punishment for Collective Punishment?

Collective Punishment for Collective Punishment?

Shalzed Investigates Why Malaysia Won’t Admit Israelis

              I was on the phone with my brother in Israel when Shalzed rang the doorbell. I told Yoni that I had to run as I buzzed Shalzed up. “Don’t worry, I’m sure we’ll find another way to get Benny home,” I told Yoni, checking one more travel website on my computer as Shalzed came in.

              “What’s the matter?” Shalzed asked when I hung up.

              “My brother’s son Benny is backpacking through Vietnam. His ticket home stops in Malaysia, and he just realized that Malaysia doesn’t let Israeli citizens enter the country, even to change planes.”

              Shalzed frowned. “How can that be? Why would one country not allow citizens of another country to enter?” The floor seemed to shift slightly.

              I shrugged. “It’s because they refuse to recognize Israel. Benny is also a U.S. citizen, but even if you don’t use your Israeli passport, if they find out you have one they can deport you right away.”

              “Isn’t that discrimination?” Shalzed asked. “How can Malaysia restrict entry to all Israeli citizens?”

              The walls started to move farther apart, then snapped back together. I had the by now familiar nauseous feeling as I entered the black tunnel. Then I was standing in the sun in front of a palace like building with a large, green dome. I looked around. Behind me was an enormous square, and across the square was what seemed to be a mosque, this time with a pink dome. People were all around, some going quickly about their business, but many seemed like tourists as well. Shalzed was rushing forward towards a group of men that were exiting the palace. I hurried to keep up.

“Prime Minister Ibrahim,” Shalzed called. A man wearing a plain white shirt and no tie turned, along with a few other men who seemed like guards. “Can you explain why you won’t allow Israeli citizens to enter Malaysia?”

To my surprise, Ibrahim gave Shalzed a warm smile, although his smile faded a bit as he noticed Shalzed’s unusual appearance. Maybe in Malaysia politicians were more open to being interrupted. “It is very simple,” he said. “We do not accept the existence of Israel, so we do not recognize passports from Israel for entry.”

“But how can you punish people who happen to have been born in Israel just because you disagree with their government?” Shalzed asked.

A woman carrying a clay bowl filled with grapes and berries stepped past us and approached the Prime Minister. She bowed her head and extended the bowl to him. He smiled and took a few grapes, saying something in a language I couldn’t identify, let alone understand. The guards looked at the woman warily, but did not interfere.

“It’s called antisemitism if you don’t let Jews into your country,” I added as the woman stepped away.

Ibrahim looked aghast. “Jews are most welcome,” he said. “We deny entry only to Israelis. No Israeli has a right to vacation in Malaysia. The United States does the same thing regarding many African countries too.”

Shalzed frowned, like that confused him or maybe he wasn’t sure whether or not it was true. I didn’t agree with Trump’s rules about immigration, but they were still nothing like this. “And people criticize the U.S. for it,” I said. “But at least it’s supposedly because Trump thinks they will overstay their visas and problems with security screenings, not because of their government.”

“So let me get this straight,” Shalzed interjected. “You are protesting Israel’s collective punishment of Palestinians by collective punishment against Israelis?”

One of Ibrahim’s guards stepped closer. “The Prime minister has an appointment. . .” he began.

“You can hardly compare denying entrance to a country with checkpoints, home demolitions, and confiscation of land,” Ibrahim said as the guard nudged him along.

“I have a question,” I said. Ibrahim paused and turned towards me. “What if an Arab citizen of Israel wanted to come to Malaysia, what would you say then?” Ibrahim wrinkled his forehead. “What if it was to visit an ailing relative? Would you still deny them entry then?”

“There could maybe be a humanitarian exception,” Ibrahim mumbled as his guards led him away. The ground seemed to tilt.

“Would there be humanitarian exceptions for Jewish Israelis too?” Shalzed called after the Prime Minister, who ignored Shalzed’s question and kept going on his way. The green dome seemed to get closer, then farther, and then everything was black. A moment later I was back in my apartment. I reached out and grabbed the back of a kitchen chair because it felt like everything was still swaying.

Shalzed was next to me. The transition didn’t seem to phase him, and he was watching me, looking impatient for me to get my bearings. “I didn’t realize your Earth countries prevented humans from other countries from entering at all,” he said as I got steady.

“They do it for lots of reasons,” I said.

“But should sending political messages be one?”

 

For background on Malaysia’s policy, see the Algemeiner here

shalzed and simon after tisha ba'av

Shalzed Asked Why I Was Fasting      

Shalzed Asked Why I Was Fasting

Shalzed passed by while I was waiting for the bus to come home from shul after the Tisha Ba’av service. “You look tired,” he said.

I smiled. “It’s just because I’m fasting. That’s why I’m taking the bus- I don’t want to walk in the sun.”

“Fasting? Why?”

“It’s called Tisha Ba’av,” I told him. “It commemorates the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem thousands of years ago.”

The light changed to green and a rush of cars came by. Some of the drivers slowed down, probably looking at Shalzed. “So why is it still important?” he asked.

I shrugged. “It’s part of Jewish history. And we still pray for the Temple to be rebuilt.”

“Is that really possible?” he asked. “And do you really want sacrifices to come back?” Shalzed gave me a funny look, like he was reconsidering whether he really wanted me to be the one helping him around Earth.

“We also remember the death and suffering when the temples were destroyed. Along with other suffering throughout Jewish history. The crusades, the holocaust, and now Oct. 7th. . .” A young woman carrying a water bottle covered with NPR and pride stickers glared at me as she passed, then went to lean on the other edge of the bus shelter.

“What’s the purpose of remembering?” Shalzed asked.

I shrugged. “Isn’t it important?” The bus was now at the light, and instinctively I took my fare change out of my back pocket. “If we forget the past, aren’t we doomed to repeat it?” I asked.

“So the lesson is that Jewish people need to keep themselves safe, to make sure all this destruction doesn’t happen again?”

“I think that’s part of it,” I told him. The light changed and the bus began making its way across the intersection. The woman went to the curb, staying on her side of the bus shelter with her back towards me.

“Is the fast also supposed to remind you to help prevent such suffering for others?” Shalzed asked.

The bus pulled over, and I shuffled behind the woman. I couldn’t think of anything in the Tisha Ba’av prayers about that. “Let me call you later,” I told Shalzed. “The fast is over tonight.” I got on the bus, and the woman put her water bottle on the seat next to her as I passed down the aisle. I found a seat at the back, and watched through the window as Shalzed walked away. If he had come to the Tisha Ba’av service, I wondered what he’d think?

Human Rights against peace

Human Rights Against Peace?

Human Rights Groups Oppose a Peace Agreement

Lebanon and Israel recently signed a framework agreement in an attempt to end the decades of war between them. Prominent human rights groups were opposed. Shalzed paraphrased the disagreement between them like this:

Victims of war: We want our homes and our lives back. We’re ready to accept compromise. We need peace.

Human rights activists, from safely far away: This is about justice! It’s about principles! You must keep fighting, any compromise violates international law!

Peace inevitably requires compromise, and ending war is essential to protecting human rights. Can human rights still advocate against the compromises needed for an agreement that seeks to bring peace?

can you defend human rights by violating them

Violating Human Rights to Protect Them

Shalzed Speaks with Marco Rubio About U.S. Sanctions on Cuba

Shalzed: Why is the U.S. causing human rights violations throughout Cuba? Due to U.S. Sanctions, Cuba lacks even food and medicine.

Rubio: Not true. It’s their government’s fault. Our sanctions have humanitarian exceptions.

Shalzed: What about oil?

Rubio: Not for the regime. We allow fuel imports only for the private sector.

Shalzed: But the electric grid is run by the government. And now there’s only electricity a few hours a day, transportation is barely running, and families have to burn wood to cook.

Rubio: We have to pressure Cuba’s government to stop oppressing their people.

Shalzed: But aren’t you oppressing them too?

Can the U.S. say it is defending human rights, while its actions cause the rights of the very same people it claims to defend to be violated?

For more information about the situation in Cuba from Human Rights Watch, click here:

shalzed trusting ai on the dangers of ai

Trusting AI On the Dangers of AI

Trusting AI On the Dangers of AI

Shalzed Asks Simon About a New UN Report

I was in the living room watching the World Cup game between the U.S.A. and Bosnia when Shalzed came over. I thought he would ask again why so many humans were running after the same ball, but instead he wanted to tell me about a new United Nations report on artificial intelligence. “AI can cause so much harm,” he said.

“Well I suppose. There are already cases of people falling in love with it,” I told him.

“Much more than that. Haven’t you read the report?” I shook my head. I wondered if Shalzed just assumed that most people read all UN documents cover to cover. “So look now,” he told me.

I glanced at the television. One of the U.S. defenders had just tapped the ball back to the goalie, who was gazing downfield. I took out my phone and asked ChatGPT for a summary of what the UN wrote.

“I hadn’t realized that 75% of computing power is in the United States,” I said when I finished.

“Inequality is one problem,” Shalzed said. “Some countries have more access, and it works better in common languages like English.”

“And sometimes it makes stuff up. But by now everyone knows that,” I added.

“Even so, humans still trust it,” Shalzed said. “And now the committee says there are examples of AI behaving deceptively on purpose.”

Without thinking, I glanced at the ChatGPT app open on my phone. Was that true? I knew about hallucinations, but would AI purposefully lie? “It could also be used to create fraud schemes and stuff like that,” I added. That was serious, but seemed less scary than AI going rogue all on its own.

“What about the conclusion?” Shalzed asked me.

I glanced back at the TV. Now the Bosnian goalie was bouncing the ball. The only conclusion in the summary I read was that AI could potentially be dangerous. “What about it?” I asked.

“The only thing this committee is planning to do is keep writing more reports!” he exclaimed, blinking his eyes three times.

“Well, what did you want them to do?

“At least temporarily, stop making new AI.”

I couldn’t help but chuckle. “They can’t do that, they’re just the UN.”

“Then countries should.”

“But they can’t,” I said. The report made that clear. Since AI development was centered in just a few places, most countries had no control. And the few that did wouldn’t slow things down for fear of losing their competitive edge.

“So why do the technology companies still keep making even more powerful versions?” Shalzed asked.

“Their job is to make money,” I told him.

“And they can make money by creating something as dangerous as new, untested AI?”

“There’s nothing to stop them,” I replied. Now a U.S. player was kicking a long pass across the field to a teammate who could have a direct path to the goal. The crowd cheered.

“Why don’t humans have rules that every powerful new invention has to be thoroughly tested before anyone can release it?”

I shook my head again. “Because that’s just not the way it works,” I said as the U.S. player’s shot went well above the crossbar. The crowd groaned. I looked again at my phone. I wondered if ChatGPT might sometime try to fool me on purpose. When it just summarized for me the report on the dangers of AI, was there anything it decided to leave out?

simon in kitchen

Who Decides What’s True?

Who Decides What’s True?

Shalzed Calls Simon When He Sees A Facebook Post Saying Israel Disguises Bombs as Toys

I was in my apartment scrolling through JDate when Shalzed called.

“I just saw that Israel is dropping bombs disguised as toys to kill children,” he said in an angry voice as soon as I answered.

I clicked my tongue. “Where did you see that?” I asked. “That can’t be true.”

“On Facebook.” He sent me a link to the post. It had a grainy picture of what seemed like a small soccer ball.

“What makes you think that’s a bomb?” I asked Shalzed. “Maybe it really is just a ball.”

“Well it says. . .” he began. “Hold on, I want to find out more.”

I switched back to JDate while I listened to the sound of Shalzed clicking on a computer. After a few minutes he said, “You’re right. Unexploded cluster munitions are round or oval-shaped, so it’s possible a child may pick one up thinking it’s a ball. But there is no evidence that Israel is intentionally trying to make them look like toys.”

“Of course not,” I told him.

“So why is someone allowed to post that on Facebook?” he asked. “Millions of people could come to believe something that’s not true.”

I sighed. “And who is going to decide what’s true and what’s not?”

“But this is obviously a lie, I don’t see what’s so hard.”

The profile of an out of shape woman in her late 30s appeared next on JDate. She wrote in her profile that she works out 5 times a week and is hoping to run in the Boston Marathon. Dating sites would benefit from truth checkers, too.

 

Democracy has a billionaire?

A Democracy Has a Billionaire?

Most criticism of Musk centers on inequality- how is it fair for one person to have such an obscenely large fortune, while so many others struggle to meet their basic needs. But there’s another question- Musk’s fortune enables him to bankroll politicians he agrees with and exert undue influence on the political process. Is the accumulation of such wealth as a threat to democracy itself?

shalzed world cup

Shalzed Confused by Anti-Israel Demonstration at the World Cup

Shalzed Confused by Anti-Israel Demonstration at World Cup

Shalzed wanted to learn more about Earth culture, so I invited him to join me in watching a World Cup game at “The Final Score,” a sports bar near my apartment. When we arrived they were showing Canada’s opening match.

A waiter handed us a menu, then asked if we wanted anything to drink right away. “I’ll have the big apple,” I told him. The waiter looked at Shalzed, who glanced at me. “Bring him one also,” I said.

Shalzed was immediately captivated by the game on the big screen, but then he seemed confused by the momentary excitement when a Canadian player took a shot on goal that went just above the crossbar. “They almost scored,” I told him.

“But it was quite clear from the ball’s velocity and launch angle, combined with Earth’s weak gravitation, that even the random motion of the atmosphere you call wind could not possibly have redirected it to pass into that structure,” he said.

“Sure,” I replied. I wondered if on his planet they had actual sports or more what we would call a math Olympics. The news came on the one tv in the corner that didn’t have sports, and that got Shalzed’s attention. It showed a picture of the FIFA ball in front of Toronto’s stadium covered with a sign that said, ‘Kick Israel out of FIFA.”

“Is Canada playing against Israel?” Shalzed asked. “I thought. . .”

“No,” I interrupted. “Israel isn’t even in the tournament. They just always protest against Israel, no matter what.”

“But why?” Shalzed asked. “They should protest against Canada, since it was recently accused of genocide by an international tribunal. Or they should protest the countries that do have teams in the tournament. Saudi Arabia murders and abuses migrants, discriminates against women. . .”

“They don’t care,” I interrupted. “They just target Israel.”

“But why would they single out one country? If the human rights movement violates its own principles, what good can it do?”

The waiter returned and placed our mugs on the table. Shalzed stared. “That’s not an apple,” he said.

I laughed. “It’s a cider,” I said. “Try it.”

Shalzed took a sip. “It tastes. . . unusual,” he said. “I don’t understand what it has to do with apples.

“It’s apple juice that’s fermented,” I said.

Shalzed sighed. “You humans are so confusing.”

Question: Is constant anti-Israel protest reasonable or productive? Or does an obsessive focus on Israel ruin the credibility of the human rights movement, turning what were supposed to be objective, global norms of behavior into a means of whitewashing personal bias and prejudice?

shalzed mexico city soccer

Mexico City? That Can’t be Right

Shalzed outside the opening World Cup match in Mexico City

Mexico City? That Can't Be Right

Shalzed came to Simon’s apartment when the World Cup was on, and had some questions. . .

“Why are all those humans running after the same ball?” shalzed asked.

“It’s called soccer. It’s one of the most popular sports, and this is the championship,” I told him.

The TV shifted to a wide shot of the stadium, packed with people wearing the Mexican team’s green. “Where is this taking place?” Shalzed asked.

“Mexico City. It’s Mexico vs South Africa,” I said.

Shalzed’s blinked three times. “But that’s not possible,” he said. “Certainly an event like that in Mexico would be subject to boycott.”

I wrinkled my forehead. “Why?”

“Mexico was just accused of crimes against humanity. Over 100,000 people have gone missing, often due to gangs, and the government does nothing. Relatives are left to search for their lost family members on their own.”

I didn’t know much about that, so I shrugged. “Only a few of the games are in Mexico,” I said. “The United States is hosting the most.”

The United States!” Shalzed exclaimed. “Where masked ICE agents pull people off the streets? That conducts extrajudicial killings of anyone the government claims could be a drug smuggler? How could other countries send their sports teams to participate in a competition there?”

The announcer raised his voice, drawing my gaze to the television. A Mexican player was laying on the ground, and the referee held up a yellow card. The crowd was screaming for red. “I think they decided to let the U.S. host a long time before Trump was president,” I told Shalzed.

“That doesn’t explain why the other countries don’t boycott now,” Shalzed replied.

“Some of the games are also in Canada,” I told him.

Shalzed blinked three times again. “An international tribunal just determined that Canada is guilty of ongoing genocide against its indigenous peoples!” he exclaimed. “How can this kicking a ball contest be held in a country guilty of the most serious of all crimes?”

I looked back at the screen. The player on the ground was slowly getting up. “I guess every country is guilty of something,” I said.

“Then why are only some boycotted, while others are not?” Shalzed asked.

I turned back to the TV, because I didn’t know what to say.

shalzed million for peace?

$1 Million for Peace?

$1 Million for Peace?

England, Austria, and Canada announced plans to donate around $1 million each to support organizations that promote grassroots dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians. But Shalzed has a question. . .